Place of publication:
Allg. Naturgesch. 3:1431. 1841 (H. W. Rickett & F. A. Stafleu, Taxon 8:313. 1959)
Comment:
its status as a validly published name depends on that of its basionym, Moronobea esculenta Arruda, which the Committee for Spermatophyta considered not validly published while contradictorily recommending it for rejection